Messages in this thread | | | From | (bill davidsen) | Subject | Re: RE:Re: The spam problem. | Date | 13 Aug 2002 16:47:40 GMT |
| |
In article <20020813064215.GZ32427@mea-ext.zmailer.org>, Matti Aarnio <matti.aarnio@zmailer.org> wrote:
| Quite so. We don't aim for 100% blocking, we can tolerate a few | leaking thru each month. A few each day would be too much. | | I have been monitoring what our filters do catch; sometimes | there are things I prefer not to be captured, which means we | have to fine-tune the filters a bit.. I am also sometimes | (rarely) sending a note to the message originators that their | traffic is being captured.
If you have a human to do a little of the work, you can build filters to do a three category triage; pass, fail, and human review. This allows the filters to be be MUCH tighter, but assumes 7*24 moderation of some sort.
Not a recommendation, just a thought. I have this set up on lists and posting hosts, and it works reasonably well, taking about five minutes a few times a day on the weekend. -- bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> CTO, TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |