Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Tue, 13 Aug 2002 00:13:51 +0200 (CEST) | From | Roman Zippel <> | Subject | Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: [patch] config language dep_* enhancements |
| |
Hi,
On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Tom Rini wrote:
> > More examples of the cml1 limitations can be found in arch/ppc/config.in - > > a single choice statement needs to be splitted into multiple choice > > statements. > > Er, which are you referring to here? All of the choice statements are > done for clarity here. :) Tho I was (and have been) pondering creating > arch/ppc/platforms/Config-[468]xx.in, which would rather nicely move all > of the options related to IBM 4xx processors to one file, Motorola 8xx > to another, and general PPC's nicely.
There is still a bit of overlap. Roughly it's possible to sort the machine types by cpu type, but IMO it's not the best solution. I think it would be better to sort them by general machine type.
bye, Roman
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |