This message generated a parse failure. Raw output follows here. Please use 'back' to navigate. From devnull@lkml.org Mon May 20 17:55:43 2024 Received: from spaans.ds9a.nl (adsl-xs4all.ds9a.nl [213.84.159.51]) by kylie.puddingonline.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g8IN0aX32310 for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 01:00:37 +0200 Received: (qmail 14811 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2002 08:46:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO spaans.ds9a.nl) (3ffe:8280:10:360:202:44ff:fe2a:a1dd) by mayo.ipv6.ds9a.nl with SMTP; 18 Sep 2002 08:46:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 29217 invoked by uid 1000); 17 Sep 2002 21:42:10 -0000 Received: (maildatabase); juh Received: (qmail 27818 invoked by alias); 11 Aug 2002 01:53:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 27815 invoked from network); 11 Aug 2002 01:53:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dipsaus.ds9a.tudelft.nl) (3ffe:8280:10:360:2a0:cff:fe14:9dde) by mayo.ipv6.ds9a.nl with SMTP; 11 Aug 2002 01:53:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 32132 invoked from network); 11 Aug 2002 01:53:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vger.kernel.org) (::ffff:209.116.70.75) by adsl-xs4all.ds9a.nl with SMTP; 11 Aug 2002 01:53:13 -0000 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 21:47:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 21:47:23 -0400 Received: from smtp-outbound.cwctv.net ([213.104.18.10]:24348 "EHLO smtp.cwctv.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 21:47:21 -0400 Received: from cwctv.net ([172.16.33.42]) by smtp.cwctv.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.447.44); Sun, 11 Aug 2002 02:49:42 +0100 From: To: _deepfire@mail.ru, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 02:50:45 +0100 Subject: RE:2.5 and DRM/3D infrastructure? Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Liberate TVMail 2.6 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="1029030645321" Message-Id: <052154249010b82DTVMAIL2@smtp.cwctv.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=6.0 tests=SUBJ_ENDS_IN_Q_MARK,NO_REAL_NAME version=2.31 X-Spam-Level: Lines: 86 --1029030645321 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Couldn't support be in user space? The kernel doesnt even come with a bootloader, and 3d is more xfree86 ish... On Sat, 10 Aug 2002 16:20:54 +0400 "Samium Gromoff" <_deepfire@mail.ru> wrote: --1029030645321 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.116.70.75]) by smtp.cwctv.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.447.44); Sat, 10 Aug 2002 13:32:26 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 08:17:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 08:17:11 -0400 Received: from mx1.mail.ru ([194.67.57.11]:62226 "EHLO mx1.mail.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 08:17:09 -0400 Received: from f19.int ([10.0.0.139] helo=f19.mail.ru) by mx1.mail.ru with esmtp (Exim MX.1) id 17dVEk-0007xP-00 for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 16:20:54 +0400 Received: from mail by f19.mail.ru with local (Exim FE.19) id 17dVEk-000HFm-00 for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 16:20:54 +0400 Received: from [80.79.67.2] by koi.mail.ru with HTTP; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 16:20:54 +0400 From: "Samium Gromoff" <_deepfire@mail.ru> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: 2.5 and DRM/3D infrastructure? Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: mPOP Web-Mail 2.19 X-Originating-IP: 192.168.231.142 via proxy [80.79.67.2] Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 16:20:54 +0400 Reply-To: "Samium Gromoff" <_deepfire@mail.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: linux-kernel-owner+Hell.Surfers=40cwctv.net@vger.kernel.org Regarding the list of planned changes for 2.5 i found that nothing is announced regarding DRI/DRM infrastructure. So i wonder whether the current situation is enough satisfactory, or is it just that nobody is interested in such kind of developement? Anyhow the current situation looks a bit odd, because we basically have support for a quite narrow diapasone of 3D accelerators. Does it look like the current interface could be not enough mature? (Note: this message is intended to catalyse a fruitful discussion. hint, hint...) --- cheers, Samium Gromoff__________________ ________________ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ --1029030645321-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/