Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: prevent breaking a chroot() jail? | Date | Fri, 5 Jul 2002 22:15:07 +0100 (BST) | From | Alan Cox <> |
| |
> ISTR UML had some security problems (guest processes being able to disrupt > host processes or just guest processes being able to disrupt other guest > processes). Have those been resolved yet?
Yes
> Do people use it in production? Last I heard someone had evaluated it, it > had ended up consuming way too much CPU per "jail" for whatever reason. > Perhaps things are better already...
It needs some work, and probably ultimately a couple of assists to do sigaltmm and VM style pagex - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |