lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jul]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Funding GPL projects or funding the GPL?
    On Sat, Jul 27, 2002 at 01:06:56PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
    > Some other areas won't ever get the funding through donations,
    > simply because people will freeload whenever they can and try
    > funding development as much as they can. We've seen that with
    > BitKeeper and you had to "tighten up" the license a bit in order
    > to make sure development stayed funded.

    Yeah, and I wasn't thrilled about it, I can tell you that. I had the
    same starry eyed idealistic idea that things would just work out and
    they don't. So we're essentially in a proprietary model with a funky
    dual free/pay licensing model. That's OK for us because the money
    people value their privacy.

    Actually, that's an interesting topic. Other applications could use
    the BK model of "free if you're out in the open" and pay otherwise.
    It's pretty effective. However, it doesn't work very well when the
    community beats you to hell for not being GPLed. I had a thick enough
    skin to deal with it, I doubt others would, they'd give up. It also
    doesn't work when people refuse to obey the license because they
    don't agree with it (we had plenty of that).

    That leads to the real question: what is an acceptable model for the
    community and the vendor for applications which don't work under the
    standard GPL model?

    > In short, I believe the voluntary donations aren't needed in
    > most areas people would donate to and won't make enough of an
    > impact in the areas where they are needed.

    Agreed, but his thought was to make it non-voluntary. I have my doubts
    about that working too, but there ought to be something which would work.
    --
    ---
    Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:27    [W:3.870 / U:0.124 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site