Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] VM accounting 1/3 trivial | From | Alan Cox <> | Date | 25 Jul 2002 23:31:49 +0100 |
| |
On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 21:31, Hugh Dickins wrote: > You have no protection against the earlier NORESERVEs, and I'm unclear > whether or not you want that additional protection: it's a little like > "Tainted", you won't want people raising bugs against no-overcommit when
There are two things I want to fix there - one is to account noreserve but not fail it, the other is to allow a root reservation
As to the other tests I'd rather get it merged, test it hard in a real 2.5 release and then go over and fix the other stuff and add features
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |