Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 24 Jul 2002 10:17:38 +0200 (CEST) | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [patch] irqlock patch -G3. [was Re: odd memory corruptionin2.5.27?] |
| |
On Wed, 24 Jul 2002, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> > i've fixed this in my tree: the init thread needs to start up with a > > nonzero preempt_count, and schedule_init() sets it to 0. [schedule_init() > > is the point after we can schedule.] > > Sorry about the duplicated report, I must have missed the fix in the > changelogs. [...]
sorry - i was too compact. What i wanted to say: "i agree that this is a bug, and based on your report i've fixed this bug in my tree, it will show up in the next patch". Thanks!
Ingo
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |