Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] generalized spin_lock_bit | From | Alan Cox <> | Date | 21 Jul 2002 14:48:54 +0100 |
| |
On Sun, 2002-07-21 at 02:31, David S. Miller wrote: > For an asm-generic/bitlock.h implementation it is more than > fine. That way we get asm-i386/bitlock.h that does whatever > it wants to do and the rest of asm-*/bitlock.h includes > the generic version until the arch maintainer sees fit to > do otherwise.
For an asm-generic one yes. Although you do need to add a cpu_relax() in the inner loop
Alan
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |