Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 20 Jul 2002 22:55:20 +0200 | From | David Weinehall <> | Subject | Re: [2.6] Most likely to be merged by Halloween... THE LIST |
| |
On Sat, Jul 20, 2002 at 03:30:29PM -0500, Austin Gonyou wrote: > On Sat, 2002-07-20 at 16:05, Alan Cox wrote: > ... > > > > Do you think the breakdown is realistic? > > > > > > > > -- Guillaume > > > > > > o EVMS (Enterprise Volume Management System) (EVMS team) > > > > or LVM2, which already appears to be scrubbed down and clean > > Just IMHO, LVM2 makes better sense as there currently is no "stable" > module for XFS in EVMS, AFAIK. > Also, LVM is currently in 2.4 and a lot of peopel use it, LVM2 seems to > be the proper progression for 2.6. My $0.02
I'd rather see the EVMS go in, if a choice has to be made between the two. EVMS seems to have a lot of effort put in it, and has the experience from the (very good) volume-managers that IBM have in OS/2 and AIX.
Afaik, EVMS supports LVM volumes. As for XFS, I'm sure an XFS module can be produced for EVMS (then again, XFS isn't merged yet either...)
Regards: David Weinehall _ _ // David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se> /> Northern lights wander \\ // Maintainer of the v2.0 kernel // Dance across the winter sky // \> http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/ </ Full colour fire </ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |