Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 20 Jul 2002 16:09:46 -0700 | From | William Lee Irwin III <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] for_each_pgdat |
| |
At some point in the past, Robert Love wrote: >> If Bill wants to convert pgdats to lists that is fine but is another >> step. Let's get in this first batch and that can be done off this.
On Sat, Jul 20, 2002 at 03:48:59PM -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > As we now reference them in only two places (the macro defn and > numa.c:_alloc_pages) it hardly seems worth converting to lists ... ? > (I'm going to take an axe to NUMA _alloc_pages in a minute anyway ;-))
I won't stand in the way of any of this, the list.h sort-of suggestion was merely part of questioning the pgdat_next change. In fact, it was meant more to point out what you just did, that the iterator takes the field out of direct usage except for a couple of places.
I'll stand behind these changes as they are now.
Cheers, Bill - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |