Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 09 May 2002 21:39:57 +0200 | From | Martin Dalecki <> | Subject | Re: khttpd rotten? |
| |
Uz.ytkownik David S. Miller napisa?: > From: Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au> > Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 12:30:59 -0700 > > The concern with moving one (major) application into the > kernel is that this will weaken the testing/motivation to get > zerocopy, aio and sophisticated notifications working well > for userspace. > > Actually, to the contrary, TUX was in fact an impetus for the > userlevel zerocopy and AIO bits :-) > > I personally don't see anything wrong with something like the > TUX engine being in there. At the same time I want to reiterate what > Ingo said which is what we can do in userspace catches up to what > TUX can do then we pull it out and move on to the next thing :-)
It's far easiet to add then to remove. Trust me ;-).
I vote against both of them: tux and khttpd are should have no place in the kernel of a General Pupose OS kernel.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |