Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 24 May 2002 23:07:25 +0200 (CEST) | From | Tim Schmielau <> | Subject | Re: [rfc,patch] breaking up sched.h |
| |
[lkml: sorry for double posting by mistake]
On Fri, 24 May 2002, Russell King wrote:
> The problem with linux/irq.h is that it makes many assumptions about the > per-architecture irq code. If anyone needs to include it (in its current > form), then they're accessing architecture private data that may or may > not be present. > > Maybe the correct thing would be to move linux/irq.h to linux/hw_irq.h > (so it matches asm/hw_irq.h) and move request_irq() and friends into a > new linux/irq.h
Thank you. I will do so in the sched.h cleanup patches that my heavy grepping will result in (I hope).
Tim
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |