Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 24 May 2002 12:12:16 -0400 (EDT) | From | Alexander Viro <> | Subject | Re: negative dentries wasting ram |
| |
On Fri, 24 May 2002, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> The fs access will be exactly the same, only the dentry won't be > allocated because it's just in the hash, but it has no inode and it > doesn't correspond to any on-disk dentry, we simply cannot defer the
RTFS.
Lookup on a name that has hashed negative dentry does not touch fs code. At all.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |