Messages in this thread | | | From | Daniel Phillips <> | Subject | Re: Htree directory index for Ext2, updated | Date | Sat, 18 May 2002 07:44:36 +0200 |
| |
On Saturday 18 May 2002 07:34, Andreas Dilger wrote: > On May 18, 2002 03:21 +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > Patch is severely broken in its current form, not only for the > > reasons you stated, but also because of its inability to handle > > renaming in any sane way. I want a patch --sane option. > > I bet BitKeeper gets it right... ;-) ;-) ;-)
Funny you should mention that, since Bitkeeper has embarrassed itself pretty badly with respect to patches, so far.
- Somebody decided to add another level on top of the linux root directory in their source directory. I can't import patches into that.
- I can apply patches to bitkeeper repository using the normal 'patch', but Bitkeeper gets its revenge later, as each bk edit command starts off by throwing away the patch.
Given the hype, I expected more. I want a tool to save work for me, not create new work. I don't think I'll be using Bitkeeper as a substitute for patch any time soon.
-- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |