Messages in this thread | | | From | David Mosberger <> | Date | Thu, 25 Apr 2002 11:59:19 -0700 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] SIGURG incorrectly delivered to process |
| |
>>>>> On Thu, 18 Apr 2002 15:52:32 +1000, Christopher Yeoh <cyeoh@samba.org> said:
Christopher> If a process is sent a SIGURG signal and it is blocking Christopher> SIGURG signals, when the process subsequently unblocks Christopher> SIGURG signals it will be terminated even if it is set Christopher> to the default action (SIG_DFL) which is specified by Christopher> SUSv3 to ignore that signal.
Looks like a correct fix to me. I made this change to the ia64 tree.
Thanks,
--david - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |