Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 21 Apr 2002 12:53:22 -0300 | From | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree |
| |
Em Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 11:28:36AM +0200, Jochen Friedrich escreveu: > > > We dont allow proprietary modules in the kernel, why should docs be any > > > different? > > > > The documentation being discussed is not proprietary, it only talks about a non > > essential proprietary tool used now by lots of kernel hackers. > > So would Linus accept a document on how to run Linux/390 on hercules (yet > another proprietary emulator)? This also was a FAQ on the linux-390
Don't know, tried to submit?
Just checked, Hercules is not a proprietary emulator, in fact it is licensed under the QPL. http://www.conmicro.cx/hercules/herclic.html
> mailing list until the documentation is available on the hercules home > page...
> Developing kernel stuff on 390 without emulator can be much fun as host > operators tend to get very pissed if the IPL ratio comes near to 1/min ;-)
<joke> Another good question: does Linus cares about Linux S/390? ;) </joke>
- Arnaldo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |