Messages in this thread | | | From | Daniel Phillips <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree | Date | Sat, 20 Apr 2002 17:46:57 +0200 |
| |
On Sunday 21 April 2002 17:33, Jeff Garzik wrote: > On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 03:30:38AM +0100, Ian Molton wrote: > > Jeff Garzik Awoke this dragon, who will now respond: > > > > > > Maybe I was to subtle, but your censorship argument is simply bullshit. > > > > A link to the information is completely sufficient. > > > > > > What was Daniel's action? Remove the text. Nothing else. Sure, he > > > suggested other options, but he did attempt to implement them? No. > > > > Be realistic - how is he supposed to do that? > > It's really trivial to put a document up on a Web site, before > submitting a patch to remove said document. Or to contact someone, and > get them to post the doc. > > Did he even attempt to do that? No.
You're wrong. I suggested posting the documents on the bitkeeper site among other things and Larry agreed to do that. What do you think I should have done, demanded that Larry do that?
-- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |