Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 21 Apr 2002 11:36:53 -0400 | From | Jeff Garzik <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree |
| |
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 04:46:16AM +0100, Ian Molton wrote: > Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Awoke this dragon, who will now respond: > > > The documentation being discussed is not proprietary, it only talks about > > a non essential proprietary tool used now by lots of kernel hackers. > > well, this raises an interesting point... > > should documentation be regarded as part of the package it documents or > not?
No, it doesn't raise this point. Documentation is licensed either separately, or with the package containing it. As it is here.
There is no "should it be regarded" questions.
Jeff
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |