Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 04 Mar 2002 21:47:45 -0800 | From | "Martin J. Bligh" <> | Subject | Re: 2.4.19pre1aa1 |
| |
> SGI's CpuMemSets is supposed to do that as well. We are now able to bind a > process to a set of memories, and soon we will be able to specify how > strict the allocation can be. Right now, if a process is allowed to > allocate memory from node 0, 2, and 3, it won't look outside of this set. > The memory set granularity is smaller though, because it depends on the > process, and the cpu (and thus the node) this process is running on. > The CpuMemSets have been tested and are available on the Linux Scalability > Effort sourceforge page, if you want to give it a try...
The problem with CpuMemSets is that it's mind-bogglingly complex - I think we need something simpler ... at least to start with.
M.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |