| From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | Subject | Re: [opensource] Re: Petition Against Official Endorsement of BitKeeper by Linux Maintainers | Date | 5 Mar 2002 15:14:19 -0800 |
| |
Followup to: <20020305230143.GB5538@matchmail.com> By author: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > IIRC, bitkeeper, is open source. It just doesn't have a free license. I > could be wrong(I haven't checked). If I am, someone will say so... >
A free license is a necessary, but not sufficient, requirement for something to be Open Source.
-hpa -- <hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt <amsp@zytor.com> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|