Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 04 Mar 2002 13:45:12 -0500 | From | David Dillow <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] IBM Lanstreamer bugfixes (round 3) |
| |
Jeff Garzik wrote: > > David Dillow wrote: > > > > Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > Set cache line size just like drivers/net/acenic.c does, and enable > > > memory-write-invalidate... > > > > Does this mean the setup pci_enable_device() does on the cache line size > > is not sufficient? > > pci_enable_device doesn't touch the PCI_COMMAND_INVALIDATE bit at all...
Right, I was talking more about the cache line size... is it sufficient for that?
As for PCI_COMMAND_INVALIDATE, what does that do for me; my PCI spec isn't handy....
> > I ask, because I've been relying on it for a driver I'm working on; > > should I be setting this as acenic does? It would seem that this is > > something many drivers would need to do... > > Yes, acenic is the code to copy, for setting that up.
INVALIDATE, or cache line size?
Thanks, Dave Dillow dillowd@y12.doe.gov - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |