Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 20 Mar 2002 11:28:36 -0800 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: aa-160-lru_release_check |
| |
Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Andrew Morton wrote: > > >... > > + if (unlikely(in_interrupt())) > > + BUG(); > >... > > Is there a reason against intruducing BUG_ON in 2.4? It makes such things > more readable. >
I hate BUG_ON() :) It's arse-about so you have to stare at it furiously to understand why your kernel still works.
I hope the Nobel committee is reading this mailing list: how about assert()?
- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |