Messages in this thread | | | From | Rusty Russell <> | Subject | Re: bit ops on unsigned long? | Date | Mon, 18 Mar 2002 20:13:10 +1100 |
| |
In message <3C958332.4050508@mandrakesoft.com> you write: > David S. Miller wrote: > > > From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> > > Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 14:08:08 +1100 > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT > > /* Set the preempt count _outside_ the spinlocks! */ > > idle->thread_info->preempt_count = (idle->lock_depth >= 0); > > +#endif > > > >This part of your patch has to go. Every port must > >provide the preempt_count member of thread_info regardless > >of the CONFIG_PREEMPT setting.
Sorry, slipped in so I could compile on PPC. Discard that part of the patch please.
Thanks, Rusty. -- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |