Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 15 Mar 2002 19:28:18 +0000 | From | Joel Becker <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Re: futex and timeouts |
| |
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 01:59:38PM -0500, Hubertus Franke wrote: > > > What I would like to see is an interface that lets me pass optional > > > parameters to the syscall interface, so I can call with different number > > > of parameters. > > > > Is this to lock multiple futexes "atomically"? If we are > > looking for a fast path stack-wise, this seems extra work. > > No, take for example... > > syscall3(int,futex,int,op, struct futex*, futex, int opt_arg);
Oh, I totally misparsed your statement. I thought you meant you wanted a vararg sys_futex(), not a smarter _syscall() :-)
Joel
--
Life's Little Instruction Book #347
"Never waste the oppourtunity to tell someone you love them."
http://www.jlbec.org/ jlbec@evilplan.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |