Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 14 Mar 2002 18:46:09 +0530 | From | Dipankar Sarma <> | Subject | Re: [Lse-tech] Re: 10.31 second kernel compile |
| |
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 10:27:26PM +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote: > > > > 554 .d_lookup > > > > Did you try the dcache patches? > > Not for this, I did do some benchmarking of the RCU dcache patches a > while ago which I should post.
Please do ;-) This shows why we need to ease the pressure on dcache_lock.
> > > Can you publish lockmeter stats? > > I didnt get a chance to run lockmeter, I tend to use the kernel profiler > and use a hacked readprofile (originally from tridge) that displays > profile hits vs assembly instruction. Thats usually good enough to work > out which spinlocks are a problem.
Is this a PPC only hack ? Also, where can I get it ?
Thanks -- Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com> http://lse.sourceforge.net Linux Technology Center, IBM Software Lab, Bangalore, India. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |