Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] syscall interface for cpu affinity | From | Robert Love <> | Date | 10 Mar 2002 17:11:28 -0500 |
| |
On Sun, 2002-03-10 at 17:05, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> Can't wer just copy the IRIX interface here as some other pathces have > in the past?
Is that psets? If so, no thanks.
I want a simple, clean, quick implementation. I have seen patches that do a lot more than what my simple implementation does, and that really does not interest me and I suspect Ingo and others feel the same way. Setting a simple per-task bitmask that is inherited is all we need.
Linux scheduler API is already our own standard. I'd rather support that (i.e. add another simple sched_* call) than some evil other interface - but that is just me.
Robert Love
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |