lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Mar]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] syscall interface for cpu affinity
From
Date
On Sun, 2002-03-10 at 17:05, Chris Wedgwood wrote:

> Can't wer just copy the IRIX interface here as some other pathces have
> in the past?

Is that psets? If so, no thanks.

I want a simple, clean, quick implementation. I have seen patches that
do a lot more than what my simple implementation does, and that really
does not interest me and I suspect Ingo and others feel the same way.
Setting a simple per-task bitmask that is inherited is all we need.

Linux scheduler API is already our own standard. I'd rather support
that (i.e. add another simple sched_* call) than some evil other
interface - but that is just me.

Robert Love

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:24    [W:0.184 / U:0.128 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site