lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Feb]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: kbuild [which is not only ...2]
David Woodhouse wrote:

> cate@dplanet.ch said:
>
>> I have some comment/explications about the thread about kbuild.
>>
>
> The thread isn't about kbuild. It's about <omitted>. Please do not confuse
> the two or even mention them in the same mail. It only serves to promote the
> confusion.
>
> kbuild is far more obviously the right thing to do. The main objection to it
> last time I saw a discussion was that it has a performance problem in
> certain cases -- which I believe Keith is working on.


You will confise users...

Notation:
kbuild = kernel build utilities, now = 'kbuild-2.4' + 'CML1' +
Configure.help.

Thus kbuild is not only Makefiles.

Historically (and I think still in MAINTAINERS file), the
kbuild mailing list is for configurations. There was no
real maintainer of Makefiles.


giacomo


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:24    [W:0.054 / U:0.376 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site