Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 16 Feb 2002 11:06:52 +0100 | From | "Giacomo A. Catenazzi" <> | Subject | Re: kbuild [which is not only ...2] |
| |
David Woodhouse wrote:
> cate@dplanet.ch said: > >> I have some comment/explications about the thread about kbuild. >> > > The thread isn't about kbuild. It's about <omitted>. Please do not confuse > the two or even mention them in the same mail. It only serves to promote the > confusion. > > kbuild is far more obviously the right thing to do. The main objection to it > last time I saw a discussion was that it has a performance problem in > certain cases -- which I believe Keith is working on.
You will confise users...
Notation: kbuild = kernel build utilities, now = 'kbuild-2.4' + 'CML1' + Configure.help.
Thus kbuild is not only Makefiles.
Historically (and I think still in MAINTAINERS file), the kbuild mailing list is for configurations. There was no real maintainer of Makefiles.
giacomo
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |