Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Disgusted with kbuild developers | Date | Fri, 15 Feb 2002 21:47:03 +0000 (GMT) | From | Alan Cox <> |
| |
> > Pretty much all of it. I wrote a proof of concept parser that can deduce > > the set of rules that must be enforced and what must be changed when you > > hit an option > > Alan. It didn't work. It couldn't have -- among other things, the old > language can't tell visibility from implication.
The prototype generates a very convincing table set, and the tables generate very convincing graphs. The information to work out what option needs another as I've said for months - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |