Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 14 Feb 2002 15:33:22 -0800 | From | J Sloan <> | Subject | Re: tux officially in kernel? |
| |
john slee wrote:
>On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 08:36:55AM -0800, J Sloan wrote: > >>If that's not part of the roadmap I'd be surprised, >>since tux is so much more capable than the >>khttpd which is currently part of the tree. >> >>Tux has clearly demonstrated it's performance >>and low resource consumption. >> > >it has also been demonstrated that equal performance can be had in >userland (search archives for "X15") > Well, I don't know about "equal" but many webservers have benefitted from the tux related kernel enhancements - yes I know about X15, I tested it out too...
It's fast, but tux is faster.
>. most of tux' improvements have >been generalised and absorbed into the mainline kernel anyway. > Granted -
So, just out of curioisity, why is khttpd in the kernel? If there were any web server in the mainline kernel I'd think it'd be tux -
Best Regards,
Joe
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |