Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [patch] printk and dma_addr_t | Date | Wed, 13 Feb 2002 10:23:50 +0000 (GMT) | From | Alan Cox <> |
| |
> From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> > Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 09:40:44 +0000 (GMT) > > Vomit. How about adding a dma_addr_t %code to the printk function ? > > And gcc will discover this via what? Osmosis perhaps? :-)
Yeah, seems gcc is a bit lacking in its overclever printf handlers. It lacks the ability to declare additional non standard % code - despite the fact glibc itself expands on the standard
glibc 2.0 adds conversion characters C and S.
glibc 2.1 adds length modifiers hh,j,t,z and conversion characters a,A.
glibc 2.2 adds the conversion character F with C99 seman- tics, and the flag character I.
So how do they modify the printf format rules in gcc ? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |