Messages in this thread | | | From | Daniel Phillips <> | Subject | Re: [patch] sys_sync livelock fix | Date | Thu, 14 Feb 2002 03:07:50 +0100 |
| |
On February 14, 2002 02:59 am, Mike Fedyk wrote: > On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 01:49:03AM +0100, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > Dangerous advocacy of the broken SuS semantics for sync, has to be stamped > > out before it spreads ;-) > > Daniel, > > You seem to be taking both sides of this argument. > > Do you agree that sync should be changed to a checkpoint so that doesn't > block for dirty data created *after* sync was called?
Yes, sorry if I was ambiguous in stating that in any way.
-- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |