lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Dec]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] compatibility syscall layer (lets try again)

Wouldn't it be much easier to just keep the few system calls that need
to handle such magic system call restart in architecture specific
code ? There aren't that many of them. The arch part does not even
need to contain the full body of the syscall, just a wrapper around
a "do_*" function.

After all this 32bit emulation unification should be something to make
further development easier, not a cause in itself.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:31    [W:4.148 / U:0.032 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site