Messages in this thread | | | From | "Henning P. Schmiedehausen" <> | Subject | Re: pci-skeleton duplex check | Date | Sat, 14 Dec 2002 13:17:20 +0000 (UTC) |
| |
"David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com> writes:
> From: Donald Becker <becker@scyld.com> > Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 11:56:17 -0500 (EST) > > The development criteria used to be technically based, and that is still > the public statement. Now, as your statement makes clear, working code > is an irrelevant criteria.
>No, working code is only part of the equation. If you're a total and >complete asshole, your work is likely to get lost to the sands of >time. In such a case nobody wants to deal with you.
The IDE code and one of its current maintainers disproves your point.
I did notice that it was you and not Donald who started using swear words. Ego problem?
Regards Henning -- Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen -- Geschaeftsfuehrer INTERMETA - Gesellschaft fuer Mehrwertdienste mbH hps@intermeta.de
Am Schwabachgrund 22 Fon.: 09131 / 50654-0 info@intermeta.de D-91054 Buckenhof Fax.: 09131 / 50654-20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |