lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Dec]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] compatibility syscall layer (lets try again)
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 12:11:11AM -0800, george anzinger wrote:
> So, is this overkill?

Yes. I'm also 99% certain it won't solve the problem. Really, the
only way to get this right is to make sure all the state is out where
GDB will see it and protect it. But it sounds like doing this on S/390
and ia64 is prohibitively complicated.

I'll think about it. If we can't come up with anything better we may
want to just make this behave correctly on those architectures that can
do it.

--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:31    [W:0.066 / U:0.220 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site