lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Nov]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] PARAM 2/4
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 05:51:48PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
[snip]
> 2) "proper", converted-to-Rusty-style driver code is going to have
>
> MODULE_blah
> MODULE_foo
> MODULE_bar
> PARAM
>
> You think that looks good??
>
> 3) modules a.k.a. drivers are going to be the more common users of this
> interface.
[snip]
> PARAM is ugly in drivers, and way too generic.

Why not DRIVER_PARAM in this case ? It's enough explicit and not misleading.
I too agree that PARAM is a bit too generic.

Cheers,
Willy

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:31    [W:0.088 / U:0.612 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site