Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 16 Nov 2002 08:15:09 +0100 | From | Willy Tarreau <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] PARAM 2/4 |
| |
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 05:51:48PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: [snip] > 2) "proper", converted-to-Rusty-style driver code is going to have > > MODULE_blah > MODULE_foo > MODULE_bar > PARAM > > You think that looks good?? > > 3) modules a.k.a. drivers are going to be the more common users of this > interface. [snip] > PARAM is ugly in drivers, and way too generic.
Why not DRIVER_PARAM in this case ? It's enough explicit and not misleading. I too agree that PARAM is a bit too generic.
Cheers, Willy
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |