Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 1 Nov 2002 09:41:52 +0100 | From | Matthias Schniedermeyer <> | Subject | Re: Xiafs inclusion in 2.5? |
| |
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 04:41:49AM +0100, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > Linus Torvalds wrote: > >On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > > > >>Out of curiosity, would you reaccept xiafs in 2.5, if it was cleaned up > >>and forward ported to use the new interfaces? > > > > > >Quite frankly, I probably _would_ accept it, if it's cleanly done. If only > >because of the fact that it's such a ridiculous thing to do, and thus gets > >high points on my "surreality meter". > > I will do my best and get it reviewed before submitting it. > > >>And if you accept it, what's the latest date I could submit it? > >>Technically, it is a regression, ;-) so the feature freeze date might not > >>apply. > > > > > >Yeah, I think xiafs has little to do with a feature freeze. It has little > >to do with sanity too, for that matter. > > Hey, I am insane. Sounds like the right job for me.
And when you are done with xiafs you should try to reintegrate "Extended FS". ;-)
(No i don't have anything with an extended-fs.)
Bis denn
-- Real Programmers consider "what you see is what you get" to be just as bad a concept in Text Editors as it is in women. No, the Real Programmer wants a "you asked for it, you got it" text editor -- complicated, cryptic, powerful, unforgiving, dangerous.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |