Messages in this thread | | | From | Jos Hulzink <> | Subject | Re: 2.5.45 build failed with ACPI turned on | Date | Fri, 1 Nov 2002 20:12:47 +0100 |
| |
After some more puzzling, it becomes clear that much more ACPI code should rely on CONFIG_PM. (Sleep.c should not be compiled in at all without CONFIG_PM) As the ACPI guys seem awake, I assume this will be fixed soon. For now: don't forget to enable CONFIG_PM (Power Management in the root of ACPI / APM configuration)
Jos
On Thursday 31 October 2002 20:45, Robert Varga wrote: > Hi > > Build fails with: > > drivers/acpi/sleep.c: In function `acpi_system_suspend': > drivers/acpi/sleep.c:209: warning: implicit declaration of function > `do_suspend_lowlevel' drivers/acpi/sleep.c: In function `acpi_sleep_init': > drivers/acpi/sleep.c:707: `sysrq_acpi_poweroff_op' undeclared (first use in > this function) drivers/acpi/sleep.c:707: (Each undeclared identifier is > reported only once drivers/acpi/sleep.c:707: for each function it appears > in.) > > The structure declaration is protected by > > #if defined(CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ) && defined(CONFIG_PM) > > on line 640. > > Config file attached.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |