Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 08 Oct 2002 15:20:56 -0700 (PDT) | Subject | Re: New BK License Problem? | From | "David S. Miller" <> |
| |
From: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk> Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 23:24:44 +0100
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 11:15:20PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> How about > bk-commits-head > bk-commits-2.4 > > then later bk-commits-2.6 etc... How about 'stable' and 'devel', then we won't have to worry about renaming/resubscribing when we switch revisions.
I expect people to maintain 2.4.x even when 2.6.x is "stable" even once 2.7.x has begun.
Therefore, I like your first idea the best.
Ok? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |