lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    SubjectRe: New BK License Problem?
    From
       From: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
    Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 23:24:44 +0100

    On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 11:15:20PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:

    > How about
    > bk-commits-head
    > bk-commits-2.4
    >
    > then later bk-commits-2.6 etc...

    How about 'stable' and 'devel', then we won't have to worry
    about renaming/resubscribing when we switch revisions.

    I expect people to maintain 2.4.x even when 2.6.x is
    "stable" even once 2.7.x has begun.

    Therefore, I like your first idea the best.

    Ok?
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:29    [W:2.743 / U:0.012 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site