lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.5.44-mm6
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Rik van Riel wrote:
> > > Just let me know if you're interested in my load control mechanism
> > > and I'll send it to you.
> > It would also be interesting to know if we really care?
>
> I think there is a need for keeping an overloaded machine in some way
> usable, not because anyone is really running it that way, but because
> the sysadmin needs a way to determine why a correctly sized machine is
> suddenly seeing a high load.

Indeed, it's a stability thing, not a performance thing.

It's Not Good(tm) to have a system completely crap out because
of a load spike. Instead it should survive the load spike and
go on with life.

Rik
--
Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".
http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
Current spamtrap: <a href=mailto:"october@surriel.com">october@surriel.com</a>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:30    [W:0.073 / U:0.520 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site