Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] use 1ULL instead of 1UL in kernel/signal.c | From | Alan Cox <> | Date | 23 Oct 2002 00:17:12 +0100 |
| |
On Tue, 2002-10-22 at 22:48, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 10:57:59PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > On Tue, 2002-10-22 at 22:27, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > > > > On PA-RISC we have 36 signals defined for hpux compatibility. So M() > > > and T() in kernel/signal.c try to do (1UL << 33) which is garbage on 32-bit > > > architectures. How do people feel about this patch? > > > > How does the compiler output look ? > > uhh.. 200 bytes extra on x86 ;-( > > -rw-r--r-- 1 willy users 17956 Oct 22 14:44 kernel/signal.o > -rw-r--r-- 1 willy users 17748 Oct 22 06:50 kernel/signal.o_orig
Care to move the define into include/asm-foo then ?
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |