lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] fixes for building kernel using Intel compiler
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 05:45:08PM -0700, Nakajima, Jun wrote:
> No, it removes most of such cases. It happens only for a general boolean
> controlling expression, and this is the only spot as far as we tested. But

So it would be optimized away if changed to

if ((offsetof(struct task_struct, thread.i387.fxsave) & 15) != 0) {

?

> our argument is that the checking code is not required because
> thread.i387.fxsave is __attribute__ ((aligned (16))). If __attribute__
> ((aligned (...))) is broken, we should see more problems.

I think it would be better to keep the check, even with attribute aligned. These bugs
are nasty to debug when they happen.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:30    [W:0.032 / U:3.004 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site