lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.40-mm2 with contest
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Con Kolivas wrote:

> > Problem is, users have said they don't want that. They say that they
> > want to copy ISO images about all day and not swap. I think.
>
> But do they really want that or do they think they want that without knowing the
> consequences of such a setting?

I have been able to tune bdflush in 2.4-aa kernels to be much more
aggressive about moving data to disk under write pressure, and that has
been a big plus in terms of both getting the write completed in less real
time and fewer big pauses doing trivial things like uncovering a window. I
see less swap used.

>
> > It worries me. It means that we'll be really slow to react to sudden
> > load swings, and it increases the complexity of the analysis and
> > testing. And I really do want to give the user a single knob,
> > which has understandable semantics and for which I can feasibly test
> > all operating regions.
> >
> > I really, really, really, really don't want to get too fancy in there.
>
> Well I made it as simple as I possibly could. It seems to do what they want (not
> swappy) but not at the expense of making the machine never swapping when it
> really needs to - and the performance seems to be better all round in real
> usage. I guess the only thing is it isn't a fixed number... unless we set a
> maximum swappiness level or... but then it starts getting unnecessarily
> complicated with questionable benefits.

I'm going to try this patch, but building a kernel on my standard test
machine is painfully slow, so it will come after 41-ac2. It appears to
address the balance issue dynamically.

> > I have changed this code a bit, and have added other things. Mainly
> > over on the writer throttling side, which tends to be the place where
> > the stress comes from in the first place.
>
> /me waits but is a little disappointed

I actually like the idea of writer throttling, I just wonder how it will
work at the corner cases like only one big writer (mkisofs) or the
alternative, lots of little writers.

--
bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:29    [W:0.530 / U:0.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site