Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 7 Jan 2002 17:14:11 -0500 | From | Johannes Erdfelt <> | Subject | Re: 2.4.17 usbnet usb.c: USB device not accepting new address |
| |
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002, Jörn Nettingsmeier <nettings@folkwang-hochschule.de> wrote: > Johannes Erdfelt wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jan 07, 2002, Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > kernel: usb.c: USB device not accepting new address=6 (error=-110) > > > > > > And your /proc/interrupts is ... ? > > > > Almost definately > 0. He was getting hard CRC/Timeout's out of the HC. > > before plugging the ipaq in again: > > 19: 198150 198207 IO-APIC-level aic7xxx, eth0, usb-uhci > NMI: 0 0 > LOC: 2554011 2553990 > ERR: 0 > MIS: 0 > > after plugging in: (doing `cat interrupts` continuously) > > 19: 198178 198233 IO-APIC-level aic7xxx, eth0, usb-uhci > NMI: 0 0 > LOC: 2555170 2555148 > ERR: 0 > MIS: 0 > > 19: 198187 198241 IO-APIC-level aic7xxx, eth0, usb-uhci > NMI: 0 0 > LOC: 2555323 2555301 > ERR: 0 > MIS: 0 > > 19: 198192 198248 IO-APIC-level aic7xxx, eth0, usb-uhci > NMI: 0 0 > LOC: 2555437 2555416 > ERR: 0 > MIS: 0 > > 19: 198194 198250 IO-APIC-level aic7xxx, eth0, usb-uhci > NMI: 0 0 > LOC: 2555515 2555494 > ERR: 0 > MIS: 0 > > i just realized i might have an issue with shared irqs here. aic7xxx > has my system disk, and eth0 is a realtek 8139too.o > aic7xxx and usb are on-board, so there's nothing i can do against > them sharing an interrupt. i might shuffle my nic around tomorrow, > if you guys think that it makes a difference.
It shouldn't. It seems to be getting the interrupts correctly since we saw the CRC/Timeo from the HC.
JE
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |