Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 31 Jan 2002 08:12:56 -0700 | From | Tom Rini <> | Subject | Re: A modest proposal -- We need a patch penguin |
| |
On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 09:09:06AM +0100, Christoph Rohland wrote: > Hi Linus, > > On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > it would see how far back it can go with an automatic merge and add > > "d" at the _furthest_ point possible. > > No, I would prefer a way where the developer gives the merge point and > bk checks if it merges cleanly. Else it is too easy to have merge > points which are semantically wrong.
Well, provided the 'backmerge' respects tag, or certain kinds of tags (ie the tree is 'soft tagged' as v2.5.4-pre3, v2.5.4-pre2, v2.5.4-pre1 and 'hard tagged' as v2.5.3. 'backmerge' will attempt to move a change back only as far as v2.5.3, since v2.5.3 had an API change here.
Or the other option, since this isn't the _default_ behavior, but an optional one is to give backmerge a 'don't go past tag' since the developer should be aware that the API changed at v2.5.3 or v2.5.4-pre2 and even tho the change might apply cleanly further back, since it's updating the driver to the new API, don't try anyways.)
-- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |