Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 29 Jan 2002 11:53:47 +1100 | From | Rusty Russell <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] syscall latency improvement #1 |
| |
On Mon, 28 Jan 2002 02:30:04 -0800 Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au> wrote:
> Denis Vlasenko wrote: > > > > > <thinks of another> > > > > > > s/inline//g > > > > I like this. > > Well, it's a fairly small optimisation, but it's easy. > > I did a patch a while back: http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/2.4/2.4.17-pre1/inline.patch > This is purely against core kernel files:
You *really* want to do the headers, too. As a hack you could move all the inlines into kernel/inline.c, and see what happens then.
It's the headers that make it messy as a config option (you don't want non-inline functions in your .h file, because having multiple copies loses the cache advantatge.
Rusty. -- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |