Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 28 Jan 2002 22:15:03 -0200 (BRST) | From | Rik van Riel <> | Subject | Re: Rik van Riel's vm-rmap |
| |
On 28 Jan 2002, Louis Garcia wrote:
> Should I do the rmap patch first?
Yes.
After that you can patch the low latency patch, which will give you a reject on vmscan.c
This doesn't matter because: 1) each part of the low latency patch is independant 2) -rmap already has low latency code in vmscan.c
kind regards,
Rik -- "Linux holds advantages over the single-vendor commercial OS" -- Microsoft's "Competing with Linux" document
http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |