lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] syscall latency improvement #1

On Sat, 26 Jan 2002, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 05:53:57PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > On 26 Jan 2002, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > >
> > > It doesn't explain the Athlon speedups. On athlon cli is ~4 cycles.
> >
> > .. and it probably serializes the instruction stream.
>
> I have word from AMD engineering that it doesn't stall the pipeline
> or serializes.

Note that it may not be the "cli" itself - the "iret" may be slower if it
has to enable interrupts that were disabled before. Ie the iret microcode
may have the equivalent of

/* Did eflags change? */
if ((new_eflags ^ old_eflags) & IF_MASK)
.. do sti/cli as appropriate ..

which would mean that the "cli" itself may take 4 cycles, but the "sti"
implicit in the iret will _also_ take 4 cycles and is optimized away when
not needed.

Which would add up to the 8 cycles needed for a ~3.4% speedup (this is
assuming the baseline is something like 250 cycles per system call, I've
not checked that assumption).

Linus

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:0.098 / U:0.484 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site