Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] ptrace on stopped processes (2.4) | From | OGAWA Hirofumi <> | Date | Thu, 24 Jan 2002 07:14:17 +0900 |
| |
vic <zandy@cs.wisc.edu> writes:
> Now I see the problem with PTRACE_KILL. Thanks for the example. > > I'm looking into it. I need to justify the quoted portion of the > patch or find a better way to get its effect. > > In the meantime, the problem could be fixed by changing the > PTRACE_KILL implementation to call send_sig instead of setting > exit_code. How does that strike people?
PTRACE_SYSCALL, PTRACE_CONT, and PTRACE_SINGLESTEP can't send a signal by the same reason. Please read the do_signal(). -- OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |