Messages in this thread | | | From | Dieter Nützel <> | Subject | Re: [patch] amd athlon cooling on kt266/266a chipset | Date | Thu, 24 Jan 2002 00:20:28 +0100 |
| |
On Thursday, 24. January 2002 23:50, you wrote: > On Wednesday 23 January 2002 14:18, you wrote: > > On Thursday, 24. January 2002 06:14, Timothy Covell wrote: > > > I'm confused by all of the posts and websites that > > > I've read. In particular, some of the wattage and > > > temperature claims seem outrageous. So, here's > > > what I've been able to discover > > > > > > 1. According to AMD specs, the model 3 Duron's don't > > > use more that 40 Watts maximum. > > > > > > 2. With my Duron 800 on a KT133A chipset > > > running folding@home and seti@home > > > continuously, LM sensors reports: > > > > > > SYS Temp: +45.2°C > > > > What should this number mean? > > Shouldn't this be the CPU temperature? > > This corresponds to what my BIOS says is the CPU temp. > > > > CPU Temp: +35.1°C > > > > Mobo? > > This corresponds to what my BIOS says is the system temp. > > > > SBr Temp: +25.8°C > > > > Case? > > That's my guess as well.
OK, I see.
The BIOS numbers are all mostly wrong. When you are in the BIOS config (the Del or ESC key thing)...;-) The CPU is running without any IDLE cycles at all.
> > I think this is much to high. Read my other post. > > Too high for a duron 800 running seti@home type loads nonstop?
Yes, sorry. I overlooked that.
> I think that this is the expected temperature.
What I expect is:
+45°C CPU The sensor under the CPU 'cause only the Morgan and Athlon XP/MP have the new integrated sensor but only "latest" mobos support it. Not your KT133A based one.
+35°C mobo (but I haven't anyone with sensor seen so far) Could be the CPU -10°C what's sometimes the case with some mobo manufactures.
+25°C System (the case temperature) With your system load.
An idle system should look like this:
CPU 23-25°C (with IDLE and BUS GRANT) system (case) 20-23°C (room temperature)
At any time (full load) the case temperature shouldn't go over 40°C with all stuff running (gfx, disks, lan, etc.). Recommendations from AMD and Intel.
> I've come to the conclusion that the lm_sensors stuff is crap,
No, they have the frame work in place but need the usefull bits. That's we are hunting for...
> but not totally because of the authors. It looks like the manufacturers > like VIA are not very helpful to the project.....
Very true!
Regards, Dieter -- Dieter Nützel Graduate Student, Computer Science
University of Hamburg Department of Computer Science @home: Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |