lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: FC & MULTIPATH !? (any hope?)
    From
    Date
    On Thu, 2002-01-17 at 23:07, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
    > On 2002-01-17T15:36:54,
    > Brian Beattie <alchemy@us.ibm.com> said:
    >
    > > Probable enhancements to this would include, provideing a method to mark
    > > a path to not attempt this crude form of auto recovery and a way to mark
    > > a failed path as good. Finally a device wide flag to disable
    > > auto-recovery.
    ...
    >
    > Combined with the enhancements this makes a lot of sense.
    >
    > The enhancements are very much required, especially the way to mark a path as
    > good again manually.
    >
    > I would also liks easily parseable /proc file to query the status of a
    > multi-path device, including all paths associated with it.
    >
    >
    I have some stuff that uses sysctl, which shows in /proc/sys/... that I
    was planning to use.


    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:3.055 / U:0.864 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site